2012 • Tata
Nano
Tata Nano 0.6 (38/33 Hp) 2012Overall Score46.5/100
2012 Tata Nano vs 2012 Volkswagen Up! Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2012 • Volkswagen
Up!
Volkswagen Up! 1.0 (68 Hp) 2012Overall Score46.25/100
WINNER
Tata Nano
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.
46.5–46.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Tata NanoSpecificationVolkswagen Up!
TataMakeVolkswagen
NanoModelUp!
2012Model year2012
HatchbackBody typeHatchback
4Seats5
5Doors3
Performance
Tata NanoSpecificationVolkswagen Up!
12,6 s0–100 km/h16,3 s
105 km/hTop speed164 km/h
624 ccEngine displacement999 cc
38 HPPower68 HP
51 NmTorque90 Nm
2Cylinders3
Fuel & Consumption
Tata NanoSpecificationVolkswagen Up!
Petrol / CNGFuel typePetrol / CNG
15 ltFuel tank35 lt
2,8 ltAverage consumption—
Transmission & Chassis
Tata NanoSpecificationVolkswagen Up!
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
4Gears5
135/70 R12; 155/65 R12Tyre size—
—ABSYes
Dimensions
Tata NanoSpecificationVolkswagen Up!
3099 mmLength3540 mm
1495 mmWidth1645 mm
1652 mmHeight1489 mm
735-745 KgWeight1031 Kg
2230 mmWheelbase2420 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2012 Tata Nano and 2012 Volkswagen Up! approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Tata Nano leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…