DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2012 Chevrolet Spark vs 2012 Tata Nano Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Tata Nano

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

46.25–46.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

ChevroletMakeTata
SparkModelNano
2012Model year2012
HatchbackBody typeHatchback
5Seats4
5Doors5

Performance

15,5 s0–100 km/h12,6 s
154 km/hTop speed105 km/h
995 ccEngine displacement624 cc
68 HPPower38 HP
93 NmTorque51 Nm
4Cylinders2

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol / CNG
35 ltFuel tank15 lt
6,6 ltUrban consumption—
4,2 ltExtra-urban consumption—
5,1 ltAverage consumption2,8 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears4
155/80/13Tyre size135/70 R12; 155/65 R12
YesABS—

Dimensions

3640 mmLength3099 mm
1597 mmWidth1495 mm
1522 mmHeight1652 mm
939 KgWeight735-745 Kg
2375 mmWheelbase2230 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2012 Chevrolet Spark and 2012 Tata Nano approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Tata Nano leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…