2010 • Tata
Nano
Tata Nano 0.6 (38 Hp) 2010Overall Score46.5/100
2010 Tata Nano vs 2010 Citroen C3 Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2010 • Citroen
C3
Citroen C3 1.1 (60 Hp) 2010Overall Score46.25/100
WINNER
Tata Nano
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.
46.5–46.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Tata NanoSpecificationCitroen C3
TataMakeCitroen
NanoModelC3
2010Model year2010
HatchbackBody typeHatchback
4Seats5
5Doors5
Performance
Tata NanoSpecificationCitroen C3
12,6 s0–100 km/h16,5 s
105 km/hTop speed154 km/h
624 ccEngine displacement1124 cc
38 HPPower60 HP
51 NmTorque94 Nm
2Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Tata NanoSpecificationCitroen C3
PetrolFuel typePetrol
24 ltFuel tank50 lt
—Urban consumption7,9 lt
—Extra-urban consumption4,9 lt
4,2 ltAverage consumption5,9 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Tata NanoSpecificationCitroen C3
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
4Gears5
135/70 R12; 155/65 R12Tyre size175/65 R14; 185/65 R15
—ABSYes
Dimensions
Tata NanoSpecificationCitroen C3
3164 mmLength3941 mm
1750 mmWidth1728 mm
1652 mmHeight1524 mm
695 KgWeight1010 Kg
2230 mmWheelbase2466 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2010 Tata Nano and 2010 Citroen C3 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Tata Nano leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…