DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2010 Citroen C3 vs 2010 Tata Nano Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Tata Nano

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

46.25–46.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Citroen C3SpecificationTata Nano
CitroenMakeTata
C3ModelNano
2010Model year2010
HatchbackBody typeHatchback
5Seats4
5Doors5

Performance

Citroen C3SpecificationTata Nano
16,5 s0–100 km/h12,6 s
154 km/hTop speed105 km/h
1124 ccEngine displacement624 cc
60 HPPower38 HP
94 NmTorque51 Nm
4Cylinders2

Fuel & Consumption

Citroen C3SpecificationTata Nano
PetrolFuel typePetrol
50 ltFuel tank24 lt
7,9 ltUrban consumption—
4,9 ltExtra-urban consumption—
5,9 ltAverage consumption4,2 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Citroen C3SpecificationTata Nano
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears4
175/65 R14; 185/65 R15Tyre size135/70 R12; 155/65 R12
YesABS—

Dimensions

Citroen C3SpecificationTata Nano
3941 mmLength3164 mm
1728 mmWidth1750 mm
1524 mmHeight1652 mm
1010 KgWeight695 Kg
2466 mmWheelbase2230 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2010 Citroen C3 and 2010 Tata Nano approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Tata Nano leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…