2000 • Suzuki
Vitara
Suzuki Vitara 1.9 TDI (3 dr) 2000Overall Score43.25/100
2000 Suzuki Vitara vs 2000 Kia Retona Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2000 • Kia
Retona
Kia Retona 2.0 D (87 Hp) 2000Overall Score43.5/100
WINNER
Kia Retona
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.
43.25–43.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Suzuki VitaraSpecificationKia Retona
SuzukiMakeKia
VitaraModelRetona
2000Model year2000
Off-road vehicleBody typeOff-road vehicle
5Seats5
3Doors3
Performance
Suzuki VitaraSpecificationKia Retona
17,0 s0–100 km/h20,5 s
150 km/hTop speed120 km/h
1905 ccEngine displacement1998 cc
75 HPPower87 HP
135 NmTorque200 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Suzuki VitaraSpecificationKia Retona
DieselFuel typeDiesel
42 ltFuel tank60 lt
9,4 ltUrban consumption11,5 lt
6,9 ltExtra-urban consumption9,1 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Dimensions
Suzuki VitaraSpecificationKia Retona
3650 mmLength4000 mm
1630 mmWidth1745 mm
1665 mmHeight1835 mm
1230 KgWeight1505 Kg
2200 mmWheelbase2360 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2000 Suzuki Vitara and 2000 Kia Retona approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Kia Retona leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…