DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1999 Suzuki Vitara vs 2000 Fiat Bravo Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Fiat Bravo

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

42.25–43.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

SuzukiMakeFiat
VitaraModelBravo
1999Model year2000
Off-road vehicleBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
3Doors3

Performance

17,0 s0–100 km/h15,1 s
150 km/hTop speed165 km/h
1905 ccEngine displacement1910 cc
75 HPPower75 HP
135 NmTorque147 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typeDiesel
42 ltFuel tank60 lt
9,4 ltUrban consumption8,5 lt
6,9 ltExtra-urban consumption5,1 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
195/80 R15Tyre size175/65R14
YesABS—

Dimensions

3650 mmLength4025 mm
1630 mmWidth1755 mm
1665 mmHeight1420 mm
1230 KgWeight1120 Kg
2200 mmWheelbase2540 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1999 Suzuki Vitara and 2000 Fiat Bravo approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Fiat Bravo leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…