DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Fiat Bravo vs 1999 Suzuki Vitara Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Fiat Bravo

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

43.25–42.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

FiatMakeSuzuki
BravoModelVitara
2000Model year1999
HatchbackBody typeOff-road vehicle
5Seats5
3Doors3

Performance

15,1 s0–100 km/h17,0 s
165 km/hTop speed150 km/h
1910 ccEngine displacement1905 cc
75 HPPower75 HP
147 NmTorque135 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typeDiesel
60 ltFuel tank42 lt
8,5 ltUrban consumption9,4 lt
5,1 ltExtra-urban consumption6,9 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
5Gears5
175/65R14Tyre size195/80 R15
—ABSYes

Dimensions

4025 mmLength3650 mm
1755 mmWidth1630 mm
1420 mmHeight1665 mm
1120 KgWeight1230 Kg
2540 mmWheelbase2200 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Fiat Bravo and 1999 Suzuki Vitara approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Fiat Bravo leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…