DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2009 Suzuki Swift vs 2009 Mini Convertible Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mini Convertible

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

59.5–60.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

SuzukiMakeMini
SwiftModelConvertible
2009Model year2009
HatchbackBody typeCabriolet
5Seats4
3Doors2

Performance

8,9 s0–100 km/h9,8 s
200 km/hTop speed198 km/h
1586 ccEngine displacement1598 cc
125 HPPower120 HP
148 NmTorque160 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
45 ltFuel tank40 lt
9,0 ltUrban consumption7,2 lt
6,2 ltExtra-urban consumption4,9 lt
7,2 ltAverage consumption5,7 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears6
195/45 R17Tyre size175/65 R15 84H
YesABSYes

Dimensions

3765 mmLength3699 mm
1690 mmWidth1683 mm
1500 mmHeight1414 mm
1105 KgWeight1165 Kg
2380 mmWheelbase2467 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2009 Suzuki Swift and 2009 Mini Convertible approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mini Convertible leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…