DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2009 Kia Ceed vs 2009 Suzuki Swift Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Kia Ceed

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

60.25–59.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

KiaMakeSuzuki
CeedModelSwift
2009Model year2009
EstateBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
5Doors3

Performance

11,2 s0–100 km/h8,9 s
197 km/hTop speed200 km/h
1582 ccEngine displacement1586 cc
128 HPPower125 HP
255 NmTorque148 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
53 ltFuel tank45 lt
5,3 ltUrban consumption9,0 lt
4,2 ltExtra-urban consumption6,2 lt
4,6 ltAverage consumption7,2 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears5
185/65 R15; 195/65 R15; 205/55 R16Tyre size195/45 R17
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4470 mmLength3765 mm
1790 mmWidth1690 mm
1525 mmHeight1500 mm
1419 KgWeight1105 Kg
2650 mmWheelbase2380 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2009 Kia Ceed and 2009 Suzuki Swift approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Kia Ceed leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…