DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2017 Suzuki Swift vs 2017 Skoda Rapid Spaceback Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Skoda Rapid Spaceback

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

59.25–60.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

SuzukiMakeSkoda
SwiftModelRapid Spaceback
2017Model year2017
HatchbackBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

10,6 s0–100 km/h11,0 s
195 km/hTop speed184 km/h
998 ccEngine displacement999 cc
112 HPPower95 HP
170 NmTorque160 Nm
3Cylinders3

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
37 ltFuel tank55 lt
5,7 ltUrban consumption5,4 lt
4,0 ltExtra-urban consumption4,0 lt
4,6 ltAverage consumption4,7 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
—TransmissionManual
185/55 R16Tyre size15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

3840 mmLength4304 mm
1735 mmWidth1706 mm
1480 mmHeight1459 mm
940 KgWeight1199 kg
—Luggage capacity384 lt
2450 mmWheelbase—

Additional Features

Skoda Rapid SpacebackDriver AirbagPassenger AirbagSide AirbagABSEBDESPASRHill Start AssistTyre Pressure MonitoringTrip Computerstart-stopPower Rear WindowsPower Front WindowsManual Air ConditioningIlluminated Vanity MirrorUSB Port

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2017 Suzuki Swift and 2017 Skoda Rapid Spaceback approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Skoda Rapid Spaceback leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…