DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2017 Skoda Rapid Spaceback vs 2017 Suzuki Swift Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Skoda Rapid Spaceback

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

60.25–59.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

SkodaMakeSuzuki
Rapid SpacebackModelSwift
2017Model year2017
HatchbackBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

11,0 s0–100 km/h10,6 s
184 km/hTop speed195 km/h
999 ccEngine displacement998 cc
95 HPPower112 HP
160 NmTorque170 Nm
3Cylinders3

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
55 ltFuel tank37 lt
5,4 ltUrban consumption5,7 lt
4,0 ltExtra-urban consumption4,0 lt
4,7 ltAverage consumption4,6 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
ManualTransmission—
15Tyre size185/55 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4304 mmLength3840 mm
1706 mmWidth1735 mm
1459 mmHeight1480 mm
1199 kgWeight940 Kg
384 ltLuggage capacity—
—Wheelbase2450 mm

Additional Features

Skoda Rapid SpacebackDriver AirbagPassenger AirbagSide AirbagABSEBDESPASRHill Start AssistTyre Pressure MonitoringTrip Computerstart-stopPower Rear WindowsPower Front WindowsManual Air ConditioningIlluminated Vanity MirrorUSB Port

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2017 Skoda Rapid Spaceback and 2017 Suzuki Swift approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Skoda Rapid Spaceback leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…