DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2007 Suzuki Reno vs 2007 Subaru Forester Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Subaru Forester

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

62.5–63.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

SuzukiMakeSubaru
RenoModelForester
2007Model year2007
HatchbackBody typeCrossover
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

—0–100 km/h9,7 s
0 km/hTop speed197 km/h
1998 ccEngine displacement1994 cc
128 HPPower150 HP
174 NmTorque196 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
0 ltFuel tank60 lt
—Urban consumption12,3 lt
—Extra-urban consumption7,5 lt
—Average consumption9,3 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
5Gears5
195/55 R15Tyre size215/60 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4295 mmLength4485 mm
1725 mmWidth1735 mm
1445 mmHeight1590 mm
—Weight1390 Kg
2600 mmWheelbase2525 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2007 Suzuki Reno and 2007 Subaru Forester approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Subaru Forester leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…