2007 • Subaru
Forester
Subaru Forester 2.0X (150 Hp) 2007Overall Score63.25/100
2007 Subaru Forester vs 2007 Suzuki Reno Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2007 • Suzuki
Reno
Suzuki Reno 2.0i (128 Hp) 2007Overall Score62.5/100
WINNER
Subaru Forester
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
63.25–62.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Subaru ForesterSpecificationSuzuki Reno
SubaruMakeSuzuki
ForesterModelReno
2007Model year2007
CrossoverBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
5Doors5
Performance
Subaru ForesterSpecificationSuzuki Reno
9,7 s0–100 km/h—
197 km/hTop speed0 km/h
1994 ccEngine displacement1998 cc
150 HPPower128 HP
196 NmTorque174 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Subaru ForesterSpecificationSuzuki Reno
PetrolFuel typePetrol
60 ltFuel tank0 lt
12,3 ltUrban consumption—
7,5 ltExtra-urban consumption—
9,3 ltAverage consumption—
Transmission & Chassis
Subaru ForesterSpecificationSuzuki Reno
4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
215/60 R16Tyre size195/55 R15
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Subaru ForesterSpecificationSuzuki Reno
4485 mmLength4295 mm
1735 mmWidth1725 mm
1590 mmHeight1445 mm
1390 KgWeight—
2525 mmWheelbase2600 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2007 Subaru Forester and 2007 Suzuki Reno approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Subaru Forester leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…