DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2016 Suzuki Kizashi vs 2016 Mitsubishi Triton Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Suzuki Kizashi

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

70.5–69.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

SuzukiMakeMitsubishi
KizashiModelTriton
2016Model year2016
SedanBody typePick-up
5Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

7,8 s0–100 km/h—
215 km/hTop speed0 km/h
2393 ccEngine displacement2477 cc
178 HPPower136 HP
230 NmTorque324 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
63 ltFuel tank75 lt
10,6 ltUrban consumption—
6,3 ltExtra-urban consumption—
7,9 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
6Gears5
235/45 R18 94WTyre size245/70 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4650 mmLength5280 mm
1820 mmWidth1815 mm
1470 mmHeight1780 mm
1494 KgWeight1820 Kg
2700 mmWheelbase3000 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2016 Suzuki Kizashi and 2016 Mitsubishi Triton approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Suzuki Kizashi leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…