DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2016 Mitsubishi Triton vs 2016 Suzuki Kizashi Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Suzuki Kizashi

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

69.75–70.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MitsubishiMakeSuzuki
TritonModelKizashi
2016Model year2016
Pick-upBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

—0–100 km/h7,8 s
0 km/hTop speed215 km/h
2477 ccEngine displacement2393 cc
136 HPPower178 HP
324 NmTorque230 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
75 ltFuel tank63 lt
—Urban consumption10,6 lt
—Extra-urban consumption6,3 lt
—Average consumption7,9 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears6
245/70 R16Tyre size235/45 R18 94W
YesABSYes

Dimensions

5280 mmLength4650 mm
1815 mmWidth1820 mm
1780 mmHeight1470 mm
1820 KgWeight1494 Kg
3000 mmWheelbase2700 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2016 Mitsubishi Triton and 2016 Suzuki Kizashi approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Suzuki Kizashi leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…