DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2005 Nissan Cima vs 2004 BMW 6 Serisi Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Nissan Cima

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

84.75–84.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

NissanMakeBMW
CimaModel6 Serisi
2005Model year2004
SedanBody typeCoupe
5Seats2+2
4Doors2

Performance

—0–100 km/h6,5 s
230 km/hTop speed250 km/h
2988 ccEngine displacement2996 cc
280 HPPower258 HP
387 NmTorque300 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
80 ltFuel tank70 lt
—Urban consumption13,1 lt
—Extra-urban consumption6,7 lt
11 ltAverage consumption9,0 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears6
225/55 R17Tyre size245/40 R17
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4970 mmLength4820 mm
1820 mmWidth1855 mm
1450 mmHeight1373 mm
1670 KgWeight1490 Kg
2830 mmWheelbase2780 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2005 Nissan Cima and 2004 BMW 6 Serisi approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Nissan Cima leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…