DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2013 Suzuki Grand Vitara vs 2013 Mini Convertible Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Suzuki Grand Vitara

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

61.25–60.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

SuzukiMakeMini
Grand VitaraModelConvertible
2013Model year2013
SUVBody typeCabriolet
5Seats4
5Doors2

Performance

14,4 s0–100 km/h10,3 s
160 km/hTop speed194 km/h
1586 ccEngine displacement1598 cc
106 HPPower112 HP
145 NmTorque270 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
55 ltFuel tank40 lt
10,7 ltUrban consumption4,5 lt
7,8 ltExtra-urban consumption3,7 lt
9,3 ltAverage consumption4,0 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears6
ManualTransmission—
16Tyre size175/65 R15 84H
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4005 mmLength3723 mm
1810 mmWidth1683 mm
1695 mmHeight1414 mm
1370 kgWeight1200 Kg
184 ltLuggage capacity—
—Wheelbase2467 mm

Additional Features

Suzuki Grand VitaraDriver AirbagPassenger AirbagSide AirbagKnee AirbagABSEBDESPASRHill Start AssistCruise ControlTrip ComputerArmrestPower Rear WindowsPower Front WindowsLeather Steering WheelDigital Climate ControlIlluminated Vanity MirrorFront Fog LightsRear Fog LightsAlloy WheelsRear Parking SensorsFolding MirrorsXenon HeadlightsSunroof

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2013 Suzuki Grand Vitara and 2013 Mini Convertible approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Suzuki Grand Vitara leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…