DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2013 Opel Combo vs 2013 Suzuki Grand Vitara Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Suzuki Grand Vitara

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

60.25–61.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

OpelMakeSuzuki
ComboModelGrand Vitara
2013Model year2013
MinivanBody typeSUV
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

13,4 s0–100 km/h14,4 s
164 km/hTop speed160 km/h
1598 ccEngine displacement1586 cc
105 HPPower106 HP
290 NmTorque145 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
60 ltFuel tank55 lt
7,1 ltUrban consumption10,7 lt
5,3 ltExtra-urban consumption7,8 lt
6,0 ltAverage consumption9,3 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
6Gears5
—TransmissionManual
—Tyre size16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4390 mmLength4005 mm
1831 mmWidth1810 mm
1845-2100 mmHeight1695 mm
—Weight1370 kg
—Luggage capacity184 lt
2755 mmWheelbase—

Additional Features

Opel Combo

No additional feature records are available.

Suzuki Grand VitaraDriver AirbagPassenger AirbagSide AirbagKnee AirbagABSEBDESPASRHill Start AssistCruise ControlTrip ComputerArmrestPower Rear WindowsPower Front WindowsLeather Steering WheelDigital Climate ControlIlluminated Vanity MirrorFront Fog LightsRear Fog LightsAlloy WheelsRear Parking SensorsFolding MirrorsXenon HeadlightsSunroof

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2013 Opel Combo and 2013 Suzuki Grand Vitara approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Suzuki Grand Vitara leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…