DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2003 Suzuki Escudo vs 2003 MG ZR Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

MG ZR

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

59.5–60.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Suzuki EscudoSpecificationMG ZR
SuzukiMakeMG
EscudoModelZR
2003Model year2003
—Body typeHatchback
—Seats5
—Doors3/5

Performance

Suzuki EscudoSpecificationMG ZR
—0–100 km/h10,0 s
0 km/hTop speed185 km/h
1995 ccEngine displacement1994 cc
140 HPPower113 HP
186 NmTorque260 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Suzuki EscudoSpecificationMG ZR
PetrolFuel typeDiesel
0 ltFuel tank50 lt
—Urban consumption7,7 lt
—Extra-urban consumption4,2 lt
—Average consumption5,6 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Suzuki EscudoSpecificationMG ZR
—DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
—Gears5
—Tyre size205/50 R16
—ABSYes

Dimensions

Suzuki EscudoSpecificationMG ZR
—Length4011 mm
—Width1690 mm
—Height1400 mm
—Weight1155 Kg
—Wheelbase2502 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2003 Suzuki Escudo and 2003 MG ZR approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, MG ZR leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…