2017 • Suzuki
Baleno
Suzuki Baleno GL 2017 1.2 90 HPOverall Score57.25/100
2017 Suzuki Baleno vs 2017 Honda WR-V Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2017 • Honda
WR-V
Honda WR-V 1.2 i-VTEC (90 Hp) 2017Overall Score57.5/100
WINNER
Honda WR-V
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.
57.25–57.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Suzuki BalenoSpecificationHonda WR-V
SuzukiMakeHonda
BalenoModelWR-V
2017Model year2017
HatchbackBody typeSUV
5Seats5
5Doors5
Performance
Suzuki BalenoSpecificationHonda WR-V
12,3 s0–100 km/h—
180 km/hTop speed0 km/h
1242 ccEngine displacement1199 cc
90 HPPower90 HP
120 NmTorque110 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Suzuki BalenoSpecificationHonda WR-V
PetrolFuel typePetrol
37 ltFuel tank40 lt
5,6 ltUrban consumption—
4,0 ltExtra-urban consumption—
4,8 ltAverage consumption—
Transmission & Chassis
Suzuki BalenoSpecificationHonda WR-V
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
ManualTransmission—
16Tyre size195/60 R16
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Suzuki BalenoSpecificationHonda WR-V
3995 mmLength3999 mm
1745 mmWidth1734 mm
1470 mmHeight1601 mm
865 kgWeight1087-1104 Kg
320 ltLuggage capacity—
—Wheelbase2555 mm
Additional Features
No additional feature records are available.
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2017 Suzuki Baleno and 2017 Honda WR-V approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Honda WR-V leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…