DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2017 Honda WR-V vs 2017 Suzuki Baleno Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Honda WR-V

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

57.5–57.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

HondaMakeSuzuki
WR-VModelBaleno
2017Model year2017
SUVBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

—0–100 km/h12,3 s
0 km/hTop speed180 km/h
1199 ccEngine displacement1242 cc
90 HPPower90 HP
110 NmTorque120 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
40 ltFuel tank37 lt
—Urban consumption5,6 lt
—Extra-urban consumption4,0 lt
—Average consumption4,8 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
—TransmissionManual
195/60 R16Tyre size16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

3999 mmLength3995 mm
1734 mmWidth1745 mm
1601 mmHeight1470 mm
1087-1104 KgWeight865 kg
—Luggage capacity320 lt
2555 mmWheelbase—

Additional Features

Honda WR-V

No additional feature records are available.

Suzuki BalenoDriver AirbagPassenger AirbagSide AirbagABSEBDESPASRHill Start AssistComing HomeLeaving HomeTrip ComputerArmrestPower Rear WindowsPower Front WindowsManual Air ConditioningIlluminated Vanity MirrorDaytime Running LightsRear Fog LightsAlloy WheelsReversing CameraLight SensorUSB PortBluetoothNavigation

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2017 Honda WR-V and 2017 Suzuki Baleno approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Honda WR-V leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…