2000 • Suzuki
Baleno
Suzuki Baleno 1.9 TD (75 Hp) 2000Overall Score56.25/100
2000 Suzuki Baleno vs 2000 Opel Combo Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2000 • Opel
Combo
Opel Combo 1.7 D (75 Hp) 2000Overall Score55.5/100
WINNER
Suzuki Baleno
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
56.25–55.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Suzuki BalenoSpecificationOpel Combo
SuzukiMakeOpel
BalenoModelCombo
2000Model year2000
SedanBody typePick-up
5Seats2
4Doors3
Performance
Suzuki BalenoSpecificationOpel Combo
160 km/hTop speed0 km/h
1905 ccEngine displacement1686 cc
75 HPPower75 HP
135 NmTorque165 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Suzuki BalenoSpecificationOpel Combo
DieselFuel typeDiesel
51 ltFuel tank52 lt
9,1 ltUrban consumption—
5,7 ltExtra-urban consumption—
Transmission & Chassis
Suzuki BalenoSpecificationOpel Combo
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
175/70 R13Tyre size—
YesABS—
Dimensions
Suzuki BalenoSpecificationOpel Combo
4195 mmLength4230 mm
1690 mmWidth1686 mm
1390 mmHeight1805 mm
1030 KgWeight—
2480 mmWheelbase2480 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2000 Suzuki Baleno and 2000 Opel Combo approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Suzuki Baleno leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…