DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Opel Combo vs 2000 Suzuki Baleno Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Suzuki Baleno

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

55.5–56.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

OpelMakeSuzuki
ComboModelBaleno
2000Model year2000
Pick-upBody typeSedan
2Seats5
3Doors4

Performance

0 km/hTop speed160 km/h
1686 ccEngine displacement1905 cc
75 HPPower75 HP
165 NmTorque135 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typeDiesel
52 ltFuel tank51 lt
—Urban consumption9,1 lt
—Extra-urban consumption5,7 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
—Tyre size175/70 R13
—ABSYes

Dimensions

4230 mmLength4195 mm
1686 mmWidth1690 mm
1805 mmHeight1390 mm
—Weight1030 Kg
2480 mmWheelbase2480 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Opel Combo and 2000 Suzuki Baleno approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Suzuki Baleno leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…