2004 • Subaru
R2
Subaru R2 0.7i 4WD (45 Hp) 2004Overall Score52.5/100
2004 Subaru R2 vs 1999 Mazda Scrum Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
1999 • Mazda
Scrum
Mazda Scrum 0.7 12V (42 Hp) 1999Overall Score51.5/100
WINNER
Subaru R2
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.
52.5–51.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Subaru R2SpecificationMazda Scrum
SubaruMakeMazda
R2ModelScrum
2004Model year1999
HatchbackBody typeMinivan
5Seats4
5Doors4
Performance
Subaru R2SpecificationMazda Scrum
0 km/hTop speed125 km/h
658 ccEngine displacement657 cc
45 HPPower42 HP
56 NmTorque57 Nm
4Cylinders3
Fuel & Consumption
Transmission & Chassis
Subaru R2SpecificationMazda Scrum
4x4DrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears5
155/65 R14Tyre size145/80 R12 S
—ABSYes
Dimensions
Subaru R2SpecificationMazda Scrum
3395 mmLength3295 mm
1475 mmWidth1395 mm
1520 mmHeight1870 mm
770 KgWeight780 Kg
2360 mmWheelbase1840 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2004 Subaru R2 and 1999 Mazda Scrum approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Subaru R2 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…