1999 • Mazda
Scrum
Mazda Scrum 0.7 12V (42 Hp) 1999Overall Score51.5/100
1999 Mazda Scrum vs 2004 Subaru R2 Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2004 • Subaru
R2
Subaru R2 0.7i 4WD (45 Hp) 2004Overall Score52.5/100
WINNER
Subaru R2
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.
51.5–52.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Mazda ScrumSpecificationSubaru R2
MazdaMakeSubaru
ScrumModelR2
1999Model year2004
MinivanBody typeHatchback
4Seats5
4Doors5
Performance
Mazda ScrumSpecificationSubaru R2
125 km/hTop speed0 km/h
657 ccEngine displacement658 cc
42 HPPower45 HP
57 NmTorque56 Nm
3Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Transmission & Chassis
Mazda ScrumSpecificationSubaru R2
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
5Gears5
145/80 R12 STyre size155/65 R14
YesABS—
Dimensions
Mazda ScrumSpecificationSubaru R2
3295 mmLength3395 mm
1395 mmWidth1475 mm
1870 mmHeight1520 mm
780 KgWeight770 Kg
1840 mmWheelbase2360 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
1999 Mazda Scrum and 2004 Subaru R2 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Subaru R2 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…