2003 • Subaru
R2
Subaru R2 0.7i 2WD (45 Hp) 2003Overall Score52.5/100
2003 Subaru R2 vs 1999 Mazda Carol Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
1999 • Mazda
Carol
Mazda Carol 0.7 12V (46 Hp) 1999Overall Score51.5/100
WINNER
Subaru R2
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.
52.5–51.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Subaru R2SpecificationMazda Carol
SubaruMakeMazda
R2ModelCarol
2003Model year1999
HatchbackBody typeHatchback
5Seats4
5Doors3/5
Performance
Subaru R2SpecificationMazda Carol
0 km/hTop speed0 km/h
658 ccEngine displacement657 cc
45 HPPower46 HP
56 NmTorque57 Nm
4Cylinders3
Fuel & Consumption
Transmission & Chassis
Subaru R2SpecificationMazda Carol
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
155/65 R14Tyre size155/65 R13 75 S
—ABSYes
Dimensions
Subaru R2SpecificationMazda Carol
3395 mmLength3395 mm
1475 mmWidth1475 mm
1520 mmHeight1450 mm
770 KgWeight680 Kg
2360 mmWheelbase2360 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2003 Subaru R2 and 1999 Mazda Carol approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Subaru R2 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…