DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1999 Subaru Pleo vs 2003 Subaru R2 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Subaru R2

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

51.5–52.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

SubaruMakeSubaru
PleoModelR2
1999Model year2003
HatchbackBody typeHatchback
4Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

130 km/hTop speed0 km/h
658 ccEngine displacement658 cc
45 HPPower45 HP
56 NmTorque56 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
32 ltFuel tank30 lt
7 ltUrban consumption—
5 ltExtra-urban consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
145/70 R12Tyre size155/65 R14
YesABS—

Dimensions

3395 mmLength3395 mm
1475 mmWidth1475 mm
1580 mmHeight1520 mm
770 KgWeight770 Kg
2310 mmWheelbase2360 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1999 Subaru Pleo and 2003 Subaru R2 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Subaru R2 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…