DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Subaru Pleo vs 1999 Mazda Carol Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Subaru Pleo

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

52.5–51.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

SubaruMakeMazda
PleoModelCarol
2000Model year1999
HatchbackBody typeHatchback
4Seats4
5Doors3/5

Performance

130 km/hTop speed0 km/h
658 ccEngine displacement657 cc
45 HPPower46 HP
56 NmTorque57 Nm
4Cylinders3

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
32 ltFuel tank30 lt
7 ltUrban consumption—
5 ltExtra-urban consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
145/70 R12Tyre size155/65 R13 75 S
YesABSYes

Dimensions

3395 mmLength3395 mm
1475 mmWidth1475 mm
1580 mmHeight1450 mm
770 KgWeight680 Kg
2310 mmWheelbase2360 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Subaru Pleo and 1999 Mazda Carol approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Subaru Pleo leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…