1999 • Mazda
Scrum
Mazda Scrum 0.7 12V (42 Hp) 1999Overall Score51.5/100
1999 Mazda Scrum vs 2000 Subaru Pleo Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2000 • Subaru
Pleo
Subaru Pleo 0.66 (45 Hp) 2000Overall Score52.5/100
WINNER
Subaru Pleo
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.
51.5–52.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Mazda ScrumSpecificationSubaru Pleo
MazdaMakeSubaru
ScrumModelPleo
1999Model year2000
MinivanBody typeHatchback
4Seats4
4Doors5
Performance
Mazda ScrumSpecificationSubaru Pleo
125 km/hTop speed130 km/h
657 ccEngine displacement658 cc
42 HPPower45 HP
57 NmTorque56 Nm
3Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Mazda ScrumSpecificationSubaru Pleo
PetrolFuel typePetrol
37 ltFuel tank32 lt
—Urban consumption7 lt
—Extra-urban consumption5 lt
4,4 ltAverage consumption—
Transmission & Chassis
Mazda ScrumSpecificationSubaru Pleo
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
145/80 R12 STyre size145/70 R12
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Mazda ScrumSpecificationSubaru Pleo
3295 mmLength3395 mm
1395 mmWidth1475 mm
1870 mmHeight1580 mm
780 KgWeight770 Kg
1840 mmWheelbase2310 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
1999 Mazda Scrum and 2000 Subaru Pleo approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Subaru Pleo leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…