2004 • Subaru
Outback
Subaru Outback 3.0R 4WD (245 Hp) 2004Overall Score68.5/100
2004 Subaru Outback vs 2005 Volvo XC90 Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2005 • Volvo
XC90
Volvo XC90 3.2 (243 Hp) 2005Overall Score67.75/100
WINNER
Subaru Outback
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
68.5–67.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Subaru OutbackSpecificationVolvo XC90
SubaruMakeVolvo
OutbackModelXC90
2004Model year2005
EstateBody typeEstate
5Seats5
5Doors5
Performance
Subaru OutbackSpecificationVolvo XC90
8,5 s0–100 km/h9,5 s
224 km/hTop speed0 km/h
3000 ccEngine displacement3192 cc
245 HPPower243 HP
297 NmTorque320 Nm
6Cylinders6
Fuel & Consumption
Subaru OutbackSpecificationVolvo XC90
PetrolFuel typePetrol
64 ltFuel tank80 lt
13,4 ltUrban consumption16,1 lt
7,6 ltExtra-urban consumption8,9 lt
9,8 ltAverage consumption11,5 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Dimensions
Subaru OutbackSpecificationVolvo XC90
4730 mmLength4807 mm
1770 mmWidth1936 mm
1545 mmHeight1784 mm
1545 KgWeight2218 Kg
2670 mmWheelbase2857 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2004 Subaru Outback and 2005 Volvo XC90 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Subaru Outback leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…