DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2003 Subaru Forester vs 2003 Opel Omega Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Subaru Forester

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

65.5–64.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

SubaruMakeOpel
ForesterModelOmega
2003Model year2003
CrossoverBody typeSedan
5Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

—0–100 km/h11,0 s
0 km/hTop speed206 km/h
2457 ccEngine displacement2497 cc
165 HPPower150 HP
225 NmTorque300 Nm
4Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
60 ltFuel tank75 lt
—Urban consumption11,9 lt
—Extra-urban consumption6,7 lt
—Average consumption8,6 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears5
215/60 R15Tyre size205/65 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4450 mmLength4898 mm
1735 mmWidth1775 mm
1585 mmHeight1450 mm
1455 KgWeight1610 Kg
2525 mmWheelbase2730 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2003 Subaru Forester and 2003 Opel Omega approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Subaru Forester leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…