DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2003 Jeep Cherokee vs 2003 Subaru Forester Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Jeep Cherokee

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

66.25–65.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

JeepMakeSubaru
CherokeeModelForester
2003Model year2003
Off-road vehicleBody typeCrossover
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

167 km/hTop speed0 km/h
2429 ccEngine displacement2457 cc
147 HPPower165 HP
215 NmTorque225 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
70 ltFuel tank60 lt
16,4 ltUrban consumption—
9,4 ltExtra-urban consumption—
11,8 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

4x4Drivetrain4x4
5Gears5
235/70 R16Tyre size215/60 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4496 mmLength4450 mm
1819 mmWidth1735 mm
1866 mmHeight1585 mm
1803 KgWeight1455 Kg
2650 mmWheelbase2525 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2003 Jeep Cherokee and 2003 Subaru Forester approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Jeep Cherokee leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…