DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2003 Subaru Forester vs 2003 Jeep Cherokee Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Jeep Cherokee

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

65.5–66.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

SubaruMakeJeep
ForesterModelCherokee
2003Model year2003
CrossoverBody typeOff-road vehicle
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

0 km/hTop speed167 km/h
2457 ccEngine displacement2429 cc
165 HPPower147 HP
225 NmTorque215 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
60 ltFuel tank70 lt
—Urban consumption16,4 lt
—Extra-urban consumption9,4 lt
—Average consumption11,8 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4Drivetrain4x4
5Gears5
215/60 R15Tyre size235/70 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4450 mmLength4496 mm
1735 mmWidth1819 mm
1585 mmHeight1866 mm
1455 KgWeight1803 Kg
2525 mmWheelbase2650 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2003 Subaru Forester and 2003 Jeep Cherokee approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Jeep Cherokee leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…