DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1999 Subaru Forester vs 2000 Subaru Forester Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Subaru Forester

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

42–43
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

SubaruMakeSubaru
ForesterModelForester
1999Model year2000
CrossoverBody typeCrossover
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

10,8 s0–100 km/h10,8 s
178 km/hTop speed178 km/h
0 ccEngine displacement0 cc
165 HPPower165 HP
0 NmTorque0 Nm

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
60 ltFuel tank60 lt
11,2 ltUrban consumption11,2 lt
8,7 ltExtra-urban consumption8,7 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4Drivetrain4x4
5Gears5
205/70 R15Tyre size205/70 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4450 mmLength4450 mm
1735 mmWidth1735 mm
1590 mmHeight1590 mm
1380 KgWeight1380 Kg
2525 mmWheelbase2525 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1999 Subaru Forester and 2000 Subaru Forester approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Subaru Forester leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…