DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Renault Scenic vs 1999 Subaru Forester Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Subaru Forester

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

41.25–42
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

RenaultMakeSubaru
ScenicModelForester
2000Model year1999
MinivanBody typeCrossover
4+1Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

—0–100 km/h10,8 s
0 km/hTop speed178 km/h
0 ccEngine displacement0 cc
98 HPPower165 HP
0 NmTorque0 Nm

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
60 ltFuel tank60 lt
—Urban consumption11,2 lt
—Extra-urban consumption8,7 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
—Gears5
195/65 R15Tyre size205/70 R15
—ABSYes

Dimensions

—Length4450 mm
—Width1735 mm
—Height1590 mm
—Weight1380 Kg
—Wheelbase2525 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Renault Scenic and 1999 Subaru Forester approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Subaru Forester leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…