2010 • Subaru
Forester
Subaru Forester 2.0X (150 Hp) 2010Overall Score63.25/100
2010 Subaru Forester vs 2011 Volvo C30 Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2011 • Volvo
C30
Volvo C30 2.0 i 16V (145) 2011Overall Score62.5/100
WINNER
Subaru Forester
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
63.25–62.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Subaru ForesterSpecificationVolvo C30
SubaruMakeVolvo
ForesterModelC30
2010Model year2011
CrossoverBody typeCoupe
5Seats5
5Doors3
Performance
Subaru ForesterSpecificationVolvo C30
9,7 s0–100 km/h9,4 s
197 km/hTop speed210 km/h
1994 ccEngine displacement1999 cc
150 HPPower145 HP
196 NmTorque185 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Subaru ForesterSpecificationVolvo C30
PetrolFuel typePetrol
60 ltFuel tank55 lt
12,3 ltUrban consumption10,2 lt
7,5 ltExtra-urban consumption5,8 lt
9,3 ltAverage consumption7,4 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Subaru ForesterSpecificationVolvo C30
4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
215/60 R16Tyre size—
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Subaru ForesterSpecificationVolvo C30
4485 mmLength4252 mm
1735 mmWidth1782 mm
1590 mmHeight1447 mm
1390 KgWeight1327 Kg
2525 mmWheelbase2640 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2010 Subaru Forester and 2011 Volvo C30 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Subaru Forester leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…