DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2010 Ford C-Max vs 2010 Subaru Forester Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Subaru Forester

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

62.5–63.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

FordMakeSubaru
C-MaxModelForester
2010Model year2010
MPVBody typeCrossover
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

9,8 s0–100 km/h9,7 s
203 km/hTop speed197 km/h
1999 ccEngine displacement1994 cc
145 HPPower150 HP
185 NmTorque196 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
55 ltFuel tank60 lt
10 ltUrban consumption12,3 lt
5,6 ltExtra-urban consumption7,5 lt
7,3 ltAverage consumption9,3 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
5Gears5
—Tyre size215/60 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4372 mmLength4485 mm
1825 mmWidth1735 mm
1595 mmHeight1590 mm
1441 KgWeight1390 Kg
2640 mmWheelbase2525 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2010 Ford C-Max and 2010 Subaru Forester approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Subaru Forester leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…