DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2010 Subaru Forester vs 2010 Renault Scenic Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Subaru Forester

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

63.25–62.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

SubaruMakeRenault
ForesterModelScenic
2010Model year2010
CrossoverBody typeMinivan
5Seats7
5Doors5

Performance

9,7 s0–100 km/h11,5 s
197 km/hTop speed195 km/h
1994 ccEngine displacement1870 cc
150 HPPower130 HP
196 NmTorque300 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
60 ltFuel tank60 lt
12,3 ltUrban consumption6,8 lt
7,5 ltExtra-urban consumption5,0 lt
9,3 ltAverage consumption5,6 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears6
215/60 R16Tyre size205/60 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4485 mmLength4560 mm
1735 mmWidth1845 mm
1590 mmHeight1645 mm
1390 KgWeight1540 Kg
2525 mmWheelbase2770 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2010 Subaru Forester and 2010 Renault Scenic approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Subaru Forester leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…