2010 • Subaru
Forester
Subaru Forester 2.0X (150 Hp) 2010Overall Score63.25/100
2010 Subaru Forester vs 2010 Mazda 3 Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2010 • Mazda
3
Mazda 3 2.0 DISI (151 Hp) 2010Overall Score62.5/100
WINNER
Subaru Forester
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
63.25–62.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Subaru ForesterSpecificationMazda 3
SubaruMakeMazda
ForesterModel3
2010Model year2010
CrossoverBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
5Doors5
Performance
Subaru ForesterSpecificationMazda 3
9,7 s0–100 km/h10,4 s
197 km/hTop speed206 km/h
1994 ccEngine displacement1999 cc
150 HPPower151 HP
196 NmTorque191 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Subaru ForesterSpecificationMazda 3
PetrolFuel typePetrol
60 ltFuel tank55 lt
12,3 ltUrban consumption9,3 lt
7,5 ltExtra-urban consumption5,4 lt
9,3 ltAverage consumption6,8 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Subaru ForesterSpecificationMazda 3
4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears6
215/60 R16Tyre size205/50 R17
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Subaru ForesterSpecificationMazda 3
4485 mmLength4460 mm
1735 mmWidth1755 mm
1590 mmHeight1470 mm
1390 KgWeight1270 Kg
2525 mmWheelbase2640 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2010 Subaru Forester and 2010 Mazda 3 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Subaru Forester leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…