2010 • Subaru
Forester
Subaru Forester 2.0X (150 Hp) 2010Overall Score63.25/100
2010 Subaru Forester vs 2011 Great Wall Steed Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2011 • Great Wall
Steed
Great Wall Steed 2.0 TCI (139 Hp) 2011Overall Score62.5/100
WINNER
Subaru Forester
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
63.25–62.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Subaru ForesterSpecificationGreat Wall Steed
SubaruMakeGreat Wall
ForesterModelSteed
2010Model year2011
CrossoverBody typePick-up
5Seats5
5Doors4
Performance
Subaru ForesterSpecificationGreat Wall Steed
9,7 s0–100 km/h12,7 s
197 km/hTop speed160 km/h
1994 ccEngine displacement1996 cc
150 HPPower139 HP
196 NmTorque305 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Subaru ForesterSpecificationGreat Wall Steed
PetrolFuel typeDiesel
60 ltFuel tank70 lt
12,3 ltUrban consumption—
7,5 ltExtra-urban consumption—
9,3 ltAverage consumption8,6 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Subaru ForesterSpecificationGreat Wall Steed
4x4Drivetrain4x4
5Gears6
215/60 R16Tyre size235/70 R16
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Subaru ForesterSpecificationGreat Wall Steed
4485 mmLength5040 mm
1735 mmWidth1800 mm
1590 mmHeight1730 mm
1390 KgWeight—
2525 mmWheelbase3050 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2010 Subaru Forester and 2011 Great Wall Steed approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Subaru Forester leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…