2010 • Subaru
Forester
Subaru Forester 2.0X (150 Hp) 2010Overall Score63.25/100
2010 Subaru Forester vs 2011 Great Wall Hover H6 Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2011 • Great Wall
Hover H6
Great Wall Hover H6 Hover 2.0 (143 Hp) 2011Overall Score62.5/100
WINNER
Subaru Forester
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
63.25–62.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Subaru ForesterSpecificationGreat Wall Hover H6
SubaruMakeGreat Wall
ForesterModelHover H6
2010Model year2011
CrossoverBody typeSUV
5Seats5
5Doors5
Performance
Subaru ForesterSpecificationGreat Wall Hover H6
9,7 s0–100 km/h11,2 s
197 km/hTop speed180 km/h
1994 ccEngine displacement1996 cc
150 HPPower143 HP
196 NmTorque310 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Subaru ForesterSpecificationGreat Wall Hover H6
PetrolFuel typeDiesel
60 ltFuel tank58 lt
12,3 ltUrban consumption—
7,5 ltExtra-urban consumption—
9,3 ltAverage consumption6,8 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Subaru ForesterSpecificationGreat Wall Hover H6
4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears6
215/60 R16Tyre size225/65 R17
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Subaru ForesterSpecificationGreat Wall Hover H6
4485 mmLength4640 mm
1735 mmWidth1825 mm
1590 mmHeight1745 mm
1390 KgWeight—
2525 mmWheelbase2680 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2010 Subaru Forester and 2011 Great Wall Hover H6 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Subaru Forester leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…