DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2010 Subaru Forester vs 2011 Chevrolet Epica Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Subaru Forester

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

63.25–62.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

SubaruMakeChevrolet
ForesterModelEpica
2010Model year2011
CrossoverBody typeSedan
5Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

9,7 s0–100 km/h9,9 s
197 km/hTop speed207 km/h
1994 ccEngine displacement1993 cc
150 HPPower143 HP
196 NmTorque195 Nm
4Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
60 ltFuel tank65 lt
12,3 ltUrban consumption11,4 lt
7,5 ltExtra-urban consumption6,3 lt
9,3 ltAverage consumption8,2 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
215/60 R16Tyre size205/60 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4485 mmLength4804 mm
1735 mmWidth1807 mm
1590 mmHeight1449 mm
1390 KgWeight1500 Kg
2525 mmWheelbase2700 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2010 Subaru Forester and 2011 Chevrolet Epica approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Subaru Forester leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…