DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2006 Subaru Forester vs 2006 Mazda 6 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Subaru Forester

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

68.5–67.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

SubaruMakeMazda
ForesterModel6
2006Model year2006
CrossoverBody typeEstate
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

8,3 s0–100 km/h9,8 s
202 km/hTop speed201 km/h
1994 ccEngine displacement1998 cc
177 HPPower143 HP
245 NmTorque360 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
60 ltFuel tank64 lt
13,3 ltUrban consumption7,6 lt
7,8 ltExtra-urban consumption5,2 lt
9,8 ltAverage consumption6,1 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears6
215/60 R16Tyre size205/55 R16 H
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4450 mmLength4710 mm
1735 mmWidth1780 mm
1585 mmHeight1480 mm
1410 KgWeight1520 Kg
2525 mmWheelbase2675 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2006 Subaru Forester and 2006 Mazda 6 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Subaru Forester leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…