DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2006 BMW X3 vs 2006 Subaru Forester Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Subaru Forester

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

68.25–68.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

BMWMakeSubaru
X3ModelForester
2006Model year2006
SUVBody typeCrossover
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

11,5 s0–100 km/h8,3 s
198 km/hTop speed202 km/h
1995 ccEngine displacement1994 cc
150 HPPower177 HP
200 NmTorque245 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
67 ltFuel tank60 lt
13,1 ltUrban consumption13,3 lt
7,1 ltExtra-urban consumption7,8 lt
9,3 ltAverage consumption9,8 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4Drivetrain4x4
5Gears5
235/55 R17Tyre size215/60 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4569 mmLength4450 mm
1853 mmWidth1735 mm
1674 mmHeight1585 mm
1660 KgWeight1410 Kg
2795 mmWheelbase2525 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2006 BMW X3 and 2006 Subaru Forester approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Subaru Forester leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…