2003 • Subaru
Forester
Subaru Forester 2.0 XT (177 Hp) 2003Overall Score65.5/100
2003 Subaru Forester vs 2003 Ford C-Max Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2003 • Ford
C-Max
Ford C-Max 2.0 TDCi (136 Hp) 2003Overall Score64.75/100
WINNER
Subaru Forester
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
65.5–64.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Subaru ForesterSpecificationFord C-Max
SubaruMakeFord
ForesterModelC-Max
2003Model year2003
CrossoverBody typeMPV
5Seats5
5Doors5
Performance
Subaru ForesterSpecificationFord C-Max
8,3 s0–100 km/h9,6 s
202 km/hTop speed200 km/h
1994 ccEngine displacement1997 cc
177 HPPower136 HP
245 NmTorque320 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Subaru ForesterSpecificationFord C-Max
PetrolFuel typeDiesel
60 ltFuel tank55 lt
13,3 ltUrban consumption7,5 lt
7,8 ltExtra-urban consumption4,5 lt
9,8 ltAverage consumption5,6 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Subaru ForesterSpecificationFord C-Max
4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears6
215/60 R16Tyre size205/55 R16
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Subaru ForesterSpecificationFord C-Max
4450 mmLength4330 mm
1735 mmWidth1820 mm
1585 mmHeight1600 mm
1410 KgWeight1391 Kg
2525 mmWheelbase2640 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2003 Subaru Forester and 2003 Ford C-Max approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Subaru Forester leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…