DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2003 Ford C-Max vs 2003 Subaru Forester Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Subaru Forester

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

64.75–65.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

FordMakeSubaru
C-MaxModelForester
2003Model year2003
MPVBody typeCrossover
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

9,6 s0–100 km/h8,3 s
200 km/hTop speed202 km/h
1997 ccEngine displacement1994 cc
136 HPPower177 HP
320 NmTorque245 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
55 ltFuel tank60 lt
7,5 ltUrban consumption13,3 lt
4,5 ltExtra-urban consumption7,8 lt
5,6 ltAverage consumption9,8 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
6Gears5
205/55 R16Tyre size215/60 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4330 mmLength4450 mm
1820 mmWidth1735 mm
1600 mmHeight1585 mm
1391 KgWeight1410 Kg
2640 mmWheelbase2525 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2003 Ford C-Max and 2003 Subaru Forester approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Subaru Forester leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…