DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2004 Subaru Forester vs 2004 MG ZS Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Subaru Forester

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

54.25–53.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

SubaruMakeMG
ForesterModelZS
2004Model year2004
CrossoverBody typeSedan
5Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

11,4 s0–100 km/h9,0 s
180 km/hTop speed19 km/h
1994 ccEngine displacement1795 cc
125 HPPower117 HP
184 NmTorque160 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
60 ltFuel tank55 lt
11,6 ltUrban consumption9,7 lt
6,7 ltExtra-urban consumption5,8 lt
8,5 ltAverage consumption7,3 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
205/70 R15Tyre size205/45 R17
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4450 mmLength4520 mm
1735 mmWidth1700 mm
1590 mmHeight1390 mm
1360 KgWeight1125 Kg
2525 mmWheelbase2620 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2004 Subaru Forester and 2004 MG ZS approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Subaru Forester leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…