DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2004 MG ZS vs 2004 Subaru Forester Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Subaru Forester

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

53.5–54.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MGMakeSubaru
ZSModelForester
2004Model year2004
SedanBody typeCrossover
5Seats5
4Doors5

Performance

9,0 s0–100 km/h11,4 s
19 km/hTop speed180 km/h
1795 ccEngine displacement1994 cc
117 HPPower125 HP
160 NmTorque184 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
55 ltFuel tank60 lt
9,7 ltUrban consumption11,6 lt
5,8 ltExtra-urban consumption6,7 lt
7,3 ltAverage consumption8,5 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
5Gears5
205/45 R17Tyre size205/70 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4520 mmLength4450 mm
1700 mmWidth1735 mm
1390 mmHeight1590 mm
1125 KgWeight1360 Kg
2620 mmWheelbase2525 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2004 MG ZS and 2004 Subaru Forester approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Subaru Forester leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…