DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2013 Subaru Forester vs 2013 Kia Optima Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Kia Optima

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

62.5–63.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

SubaruMakeKia
ForesterModelOptima
2013Model year2013
CrossoverBody typeSedan
5Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

10,3 s0–100 km/h9,4 s
186 km/hTop speed190 km/h
1998 ccEngine displacement1999 cc
147 HPPower150 HP
350 NmTorque180 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typeHybrid – Petrol / Electric
0 ltFuel tank65 lt
—Urban consumption5,9 lt
—Extra-urban consumption5,0 lt
5,9 ltAverage consumption5,1 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4Drivetrain—
6Gears—
YesABS—

Dimensions

4560 mmLength4845 mm
1780 mmWidth1830 mm
1700 mmHeight1455 mm
1540 KgWeight1587-1648 Kg
—Wheelbase2795 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2013 Subaru Forester and 2013 Kia Optima approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Kia Optima leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…