2013 • Kia
Optima
Kia Optima 2.0i 16V Hybrid (177 Hp) 2013Overall Score63.25/100
2013 Kia Optima vs 2013 Subaru Forester Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2013 • Subaru
Forester
Subaru Forester 2.0 (147 Hp) 2013Overall Score62.5/100
WINNER
Kia Optima
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
63.25–62.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Kia OptimaSpecificationSubaru Forester
KiaMakeSubaru
OptimaModelForester
2013Model year2013
SedanBody typeCrossover
5Seats5
4Doors5
Performance
Kia OptimaSpecificationSubaru Forester
9,4 s0–100 km/h10,3 s
190 km/hTop speed186 km/h
1999 ccEngine displacement1998 cc
150 HPPower147 HP
180 NmTorque350 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Kia OptimaSpecificationSubaru Forester
Hybrid – Petrol / ElectricFuel typeDiesel
65 ltFuel tank0 lt
5,9 ltUrban consumption—
5,0 ltExtra-urban consumption—
5,1 ltAverage consumption5,9 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Dimensions
Kia OptimaSpecificationSubaru Forester
4845 mmLength4560 mm
1830 mmWidth1780 mm
1455 mmHeight1700 mm
1587-1648 KgWeight1540 Kg
2795 mmWheelbase—
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2013 Kia Optima and 2013 Subaru Forester approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Kia Optima leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…